At times resolutions should be broken
Well, I am sure that most readers will not agree with the title of this write-up, but once you reach the end of the write-up, you will agree with my thought process.Usually, people make some promises and fulfilling them becomes mandatory, but that's not fair in every situation. The question arises that's why not? Let's take the example of some negative resolution in the Parliament. Everyone knows that in Parliament, a member can put forth a proposal for discussion among the parliamentarians, which is known as a motion, and later when the motion is up for voting, it becomes a resolution. In that case, sometimes some resolutions get more negative votes, and that's how it becomes a negative resolution. Whether it is right or wrong to negate a particular resolution is a secondary point here. The moot point is a resolution gets broken.
Leave aside a parliament and consider a person who resolves to inflict pain on someone. Harming others brutally, highjacking, ruining the economy, spreading rumours like fire, and carrying on unlimited malpractices are some sick desires. If such desires become a resolution for someone, rejection or control over it is a must. Is such a resolution worth appreciating? Not at all. Thus, breaking negative-minded resolutions is necessary for society's betterment and healthy living.
My submission for the topic 'Resolution'
